Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Sun 08 December 2019, 16:17

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: [RC] SharkX 1.7 RC 1  (Read 5979 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline taz

  • Moderator
  • Apprendista
  • ***
  • Posts: 70
  • SharkX modder
[RC] SharkX 1.7 RC 1
« on: Fri 01 January 2010, 16:47 »
Changelog :

Code: [Select]
SharkX v1.7RC1 - 01/01/10

fix : my mistakes @CUploadQueue::InsertInUploadingList - slots numbering and insert at upload list tail

If anyone tried compiling SharkX 1.7 betas, he probably had failed due to wrong versions of 2 header files (Winrar freshen issue) - fixed now.

 :wallbash:
« Last Edit: Sat 02 January 2010, 20:29 by taz »

Offline Raid

  • Administrator
  • Membro esperto
  • *****
  • Posts: 2200
    • www.darkforge.it
Re: [RC] SharkX 1.7 RC 1
« Reply #1 on: Sat 02 January 2010, 12:38 »
I never tried, may I check new lines? to translate I mean :wub:

rolling on windows 64 :smile: all fine

Offline taz

  • Moderator
  • Apprendista
  • ***
  • Posts: 70
  • SharkX modder
Re: [RC] SharkX 1.7 RC 1
« Reply #2 on: Sat 02 January 2010, 13:40 »
I never tried, may I check new lines? to translate I mean :wub:

If desired I can modify the new slot column title on upload list - so it can be translated (however I'm not sure it is needed).

Does the sort of upload list (only on slot focus for now) impose high CPU usage ? (list is "sorted" on new uploaders, friend slot or upload priority / PS change - though not for priority changes that are due to auto priority).

Offline Raid

  • Administrator
  • Membro esperto
  • *****
  • Posts: 2200
    • www.darkforge.it
Re: [RC] SharkX 1.7 RC 1
« Reply #3 on: Sat 02 January 2010, 15:10 »
I have no problem sorting the upload client on Transfers windows, do I have to test something more?

never registred cpu usage problems.
Files atteached on first post

Offline taz

  • Moderator
  • Apprendista
  • ***
  • Posts: 70
  • SharkX modder
Re: [RC] SharkX 1.7 RC 1
« Reply #4 on: Sat 02 January 2010, 20:37 »
I have no problem sorting the upload client on Transfers windows, do I have to test something more?

never registred cpu usage problems.
Files atteached on first post

10'x for uploading !

I'm rethinking about adding sorted slots to non slotfocus - if the cost is low (i.e. low CPU usage / or non measured), the benifit (unused UL bandwidth goes to clients with higher scores) might be worthy after all (without slotfocus - slots are almost balanced, however if it's almost without cost - why not).

I might add another goodie - suggested by Bebabob, still studing the subject  :laureato:

 

Recent topics

Creative Commons License All DarkForge.it and ValerioCipriani.com contents are published according to Creative Common License, except different instructions. The Staff is not responsible of eventually guide, article and publishing mistakes. All published items are patent free. All trade marks reported are right reserved. Contact us, Info.