DarkForge Forum

Forum principali => eMule Forge => eMule SharkX: Release e Supporto => Topic started by: taz on Fri 01 January 2010, 16:47

Title: [RC] SharkX 1.7 RC 1
Post by: taz on Fri 01 January 2010, 16:47

Changelog :

Code: [Select]

SharkX v1.7RC1 - 01/01/10

fix : my mistakes @CUploadQueue::InsertInUploadingList - slots numbering and insert at upload list tail

If anyone tried compiling SharkX 1.7 betas, he probably had failed due to wrong versions of 2 header files (Winrar freshen issue) - fixed now.

 :wallbash:

Title: Re: [RC] SharkX 1.7 RC 1
Post by: Raid on Sat 02 January 2010, 12:38

I never tried, may I check new lines? to translate I mean :wub:

rolling on windows 64 :smile: all fine

Title: Re: [RC] SharkX 1.7 RC 1
Post by: taz on Sat 02 January 2010, 13:40

Quote from: Raid on Sat 02 January 2010, 12:38

I never tried, may I check new lines? to translate I mean :wub:

If desired I can modify the new slot column title on upload list - so it can be translated (however I'm not sure it is needed).

Does the sort of upload list (only on slot focus for now) impose high CPU usage ? (list is "sorted" on new uploaders, friend slot or upload priority / PS change - though not for priority changes that are due to auto priority).

Title: Re: [RC] SharkX 1.7 RC 1
Post by: Raid on Sat 02 January 2010, 15:10

I have no problem sorting the upload client on Transfers windows, do I have to test something more?

never registred cpu usage problems.
Files atteached on first post

Title: Re: [RC] SharkX 1.7 RC 1
Post by: taz on Sat 02 January 2010, 20:37

Quote from: Raid on Sat 02 January 2010, 15:10

I have no problem sorting the upload client on Transfers windows, do I have to test something more?

never registred cpu usage problems.
Files atteached on first post

10'x for uploading !

I'm rethinking about adding sorted slots to non slotfocus - if the cost is low (i.e. low CPU usage / or non measured), the benifit (unused UL bandwidth goes to clients with higher scores) might be worthy after all (without slotfocus - slots are almost balanced, however if it's almost without cost - why not).

I might add another goodie - suggested by Bebabob, still studing the subject  :laureato: