[REL] eMule 0.48a BETA2

Started by Emulizzato, Tue 01 May 2007, 16:34

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Cris 71

Io la sto testando da una settimana e va benissimo  :thumbup:

Emulizzato


Cris 71

E' uscita la beta 2  ::)
E' già sotto che macina....... :arabicdance:

Quote("Changelog for 0.48a Beta2")
0.48a BETA2
-----------------------
- May, 08. 2007 -
-----------------------
Ornis: Changed to wizzard to set file proper file permission on installed config files
.: Fixed another Bug in the SourceExchange, which caused eMule to not response to requests in certain cases [Xman1]
.: Sorting for cumulative stats in the sharedfiles list is now properly remembered when restarting eMule
.: The "Disable UDP" and Enable "Kad" options now exclude eachother [leuk_he]
.: Fixed a bug in UPnP when the UDP port has been disabled by the user [leuk_he]
.: IRC optional serverports should work prorperly now
.: Fixed a bug in IRC when receiving ed2k links from other users
.: Added a excess flood protection for eMule IRC responses

-----------------------
- May, 05. 2007 -
-----------------------
.: The Spam indicator icon has been replaced [icon by Daan]
.: The first time wizzard is now using the proper ports when testing UPnP in case a user has changed the ports in the wizzard
.: Fixed eMule (error-)handling for files whose paths exceed the operation system pathlength limit
.: If eMule started the Windows UPnP Service but failed to forward ports via UPnP it will shutdown the service afterwards
.: Added an option to disable smileys
.: Fixed a small memleak in the smileyselector window

MsZ

 :ohmy:
Si danno da fare anche loro :P

Raid

eh mica tanto, se ne leggono di cose brutte in giro riguardo il team di sviluppo emule, vanno sbattendo le porte in faccia ai modder, vedi cosa successo a xanatos per il nat-t.

no mi sta finendo la batteria al portatile, continuo dopo, cerco di rintracciare un caricatore  :wallbash: :sdentato:

Emulizzato

Quote from: Raid on Thu 10 May 2007, 12:49
vedi cosa successo a xanatos per il nat-t.

Cosa gli hanno fatto?????? :ohmy: :ohmy: :ohmy:

Raid

rimando a e-p e a questa discussione, qui leggendo potete capire(non so se è richiesta la registrazione), tra le righe si puo seggere: spiacenti ma non abbiamo bisogno di te.

http://forum.emule-project.net/index.php?showtopic=123724&st=20

Posto anche la discussione ritagliata al solo scambio di idee tra xanatos e il team:
QuoteXANATOS
Quote.: Prepared Kad for support of obfuscated packets. This is only passive in this version yet.

Cool!
Will the final have a fully forking kad obfuscation, or have we wait till the next version for this very important improvement?

Why haven't you implemented NAT-Traversal? in Neo you have a fully working implementation of this even more important feature.

David
QuoteSOME SUPPORT
QuoteCool!
Will the final have a fully forking kad obfuscation, or have we wait till the next version for this very important improvement?
This will not be in the 0.48 release, hence it has only passive implementation but helps the debugging and testing process when implementing it on for the next release. It will not be only pure obfuscation but also some other security related changes too. Since i don't know of any problems with kad filtering yet, this is not of such a importance that it needs to be pushed into 0.48a at any price.

QuoteWhy haven't you implemented NAT-Traversal? in Neo you have a fully working implementation of this even more important feature.
I think i already mentioned that i'm not sure if this will be put into the official eMule, because its not really needed as long as the percentage of LowIDs in the network doesn't reaches a critical limit. Also with UPnP we hope to reduce the amount of LowIDs a bit further.
QuoteXANATOS
QuoteI think i already mentioned that i'm not sure if this will be put into the official eMule, because its not really needed as long as the percentage of LowIDs in the network doesn't reaches a critical limit. Also with UPnP we hope to reduce the amount of LowIDs a bit further.
I know that in the home environment Low ID's are not such a major problem, as many users have direct internet connections.
But when someone want do Filesharing from his university or corporation network this problem may become a major one becouse this networks often have firewalls denying incomming traffic, or NAT's. the way NAT-T works would allow to bypass any firewall that does not block UDP completly. The point is that such big networks usualy have a lot of upstream so the ed2k netwotk benefitys a lot from such users.

David

Cris 71

Che vuol dire in parole povere?

Emulizzato

In pratica non gliene frega na mazza della NAT-T. :idiot:

Cris 71

Mmmh avevo intuito, ma questa 48a non ho ben capito che obbiettivo ha, ora sto testando la beta2 ma sono molto tentato di tornare alla extreme....... :biggrin: